It is important to mention that “creativity” and “creative” are frequently used words in schools of architecture. Teaching design is mainly focused on creativity while it does not provide any foundation about what it means by creativity in different aspects of teaching as a professional practice.
Needless to say, we are still using an old paradigm of the Ecole des Beaux Arts in France in the eighteenth century. This is seeking brilliance only in architectural design while not looking for the creativity of the quality of teaching in design studio.
Therefore, it is very narrow, and educators almost miss a numbers of opportunities in educating students.
BUT how to increase some pedagogical capacity and creativity of studio instructors?
Mary Ashkan 